Pancreatic Microbiome Influences Cancer and Its Treatment


From Medscape

It’s not only about the gut anymore. Even the pancreas has a microbiome, one that influences pancreatic cancer progression and that can be manipulated to resensitize the immune response in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

A new study shows that pancreatic cancer harbors a 1000-fold higher concentration of bacteria compared with the normal pancreas. Moreover, the bacterial species in the pancreatic microbiome can shut down the immune response so that the pancreatic carcinoma milieu becomes ruled by immune suppression.

These observations were first made in animal models and were then extended to human patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, which is typically fatal within 2 years.

In animal models, when the microbiome is ablated, the immune response is restored, and the animals are able to respond to immunotherapy.

One of the study’s corresponding authors, George Miller, MD, leader of the Tumor Immunology Program at NYU Langone Health’s Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York City, told Medscape Medical News: “Genetic mutations are not the sole components that explain pancreatic cancer progression, as mutations alone are insufficient for disease progression. One also needs an immune system that exhibits tolerance to the tumor.”

The study was published online March 22 in Cancer Discovery.

The Study

The researchers first showed that bacteria, when fed to mice, migrate from the gut to the pancreas, and that the microbiome of normal mice was distinct from that of mice with pancreatic cancer that expresses mutant KRAS, which is the commonly mutated gene in pancreatic cancer.

To characterize the human pancreatic microbiome, the researchers, using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, showed that the pancreatic microbiome in human patients was distinct from that of persons without pancreatic cancer. (Miller explained that normal pancreatic microbiome was determined from analyses of the pancreatic microbiomes of individuals who presented for surgery for benign endocrine tumors.)

To support the notion that the pancreatic microbiome promotes progression to pancreatic dysplasia, the researchers used two mouse models — a cohort expressing mutant KRAS, and a cohort that harbored mutant KRAS as well as mutant TP53.

Tumor progression was seen in both animal models, compared with control mice, but was quicker in the cohort with both mutations. However, for animals treated with an oral antibiotic, tumor burdens were reduced by ~50%. “These studies showed that the oral antibiotic regimen was able to slow pancreatic tumor growth,” Miller said.

The researchers also showed that longitudinal pertubations in the pancreatic and gut microbiome are associated with pancreatic dysplasia over time. They did this by serially profiling fecal bacteria in mice with pancreatic cancer and in control mice over 9 months. Although the bacterial community in the gut of mice with pancreatic cancer was similar in early life to that of wild-type mice, the gut microbiomes diverged over time, and after week 20, the microbiome of mice with pancreatic cancer was distinct from that of wild-type animals.

Extending these observations to humans, the researchers showed that Proteobacteria organisms composed ~8% of gut bacteria of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients but that they increased to 50% in cancerous pancreas. When the researchers obtained samples of both feces and tumors, they were able to show a differential migration of the bacteria to the pancreas. In progression toward the oncogenic phenotype, bacteria such as ProteobacteriaActinobacteria, and Fusobacteria spp predominate the pancreatic microbiome.

Immune Involvement Explained

But how does one show that these bacteria are responsible in some measure for promoting pancreatic oncogenesis? Toward this end, the researchers ablated gut bacteria from mice with pancreatic cancer using oral antibiotics and repopulated cohorts using feces derived either from wild-type mice or cancer-bearing mice. They found that bacterial ablation (with antibiotic) protected against disease progression. They also found that repopulating with feces from mice that had pancreatic cancer accelerated tumor growth, whereas repopulating with feces from wild-type animals did not.

Miller explained that when they analyzed the immune compartment of animals with pancreatic cancer, they were able to show that ablation resulted in an increase of intratumoral T cells and a reduction in myeloid-derived suppressor cells, suggesting a change in the tumor microenvironment from immune suppression to immune activation.

An analysis of tumor-associated macrophages also confirmed a change in the type of macrophages that were recruited to the pancreatic tumor microenvironment after bacterial ablation. T-cell and chemokine profiling confirmed changes in the tumor microenvironment to one in which the immune system was activated, not suppressed.

“While combinations of changes in genes like KRAS cause cells to grow abnormally and form pancreatic tumors, our study shows that bacteria change the immune environment around cancer cells to let them grow faster in some patients than others, despite their having the same genetics,” Miller said.

The bacterial species abundant in the pancreatic microbiome release membrane components such as lipopolysaccharides and proteins such as flagellin that shift macrophages — key immune cells in the pancreas — to increase immune suppression, the authors note.

Miller explained that their experiments pointed out that suppression occurs through toll-like receptors. Suppressor macrophages bind to by-products of bacteria, and the complex induces T-cell suppression, he said.

The animal model explains how the pancreatic microbiome may establish itself in patients. “Our bacterial translocation experiments suggest interactions between the two compartments [pancreas and intestines], presumably via the pancreatic duct which is in anatomic continuity with the intestinal tract,” the researchers write.

In addition, when ablated animals were tested for programmed death–1 (PD-1) expression, the expression of PD-1 tripled, and response to PD-1-based immunotherapy was observed. This allowed the researchers to determine how to extend their observations to patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Clinical Implications

“Our results have implications for understanding immune suppression in pancreatic cancer and its reversal in the clinic,” commented senior coauthor Deepak Saxena, PhD, associate professor of basic science and craniofacial biology at the New York University College of Dentistry, New York City.

“Studies already underway in our labs seek to confirm the bacterial species most able to shut down the immune reaction to cancer cells, setting the stage for new bacteria-based diagnostic tests, combinations of antibiotics and immunotherapies, and perhaps for probiotics that prevent cancer in high-risk patients,” he said in a statement.

Miller agreed. “Our study shows that the pancreatic microbiome can be a target for therapy and offers a clue about how to use immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer, which has thus far remained unresponsive to immunotherapy,” he told Medscape Medical News.

Miller noted that the team is in the process of fine-tuning a study protocol that will determine whether giving a combination of antibiotics such as ciprofloxacin and metronidazole to patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma will improve the efficacy of a PD-1 inhibitor. They plan to recruit about 30 patients into the study.

The authors have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Cancer Discov. Published online March 22, 2018. Abstract

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s